Transfer speed?

GO TO ADMIN PANEL > ADD-ONS AND INSTALL VERTIFORO SIDEBAR TO SEE FORUMS AND SIDEBAR

Enigma

New member
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Messages
895
Points
0
Location
Kelowna Canada
it will be closer to the shuffle since it's flash memory. The shuffle can be really slow if you have it set to convert high bitrate songs to 128kbps AAC.
 

madmaxmedia

New member
Joined
Dec 12, 2003
Messages
424
Points
0
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Website
www.madmaxmedia.com
I also read somewhere that the controller chipset was mainly responsible for the slow Shuffle write time.

I guess we'll see. If it is as slow as the Shuffle, that will be a significant negative for me.
 

madmaxmedia

New member
Joined
Dec 12, 2003
Messages
424
Points
0
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Website
www.madmaxmedia.com
The nano's chipset is by PortalPlayer, which has done all the iPods except for the Shuffle. The Shuffle had a Sigmatel chipset.

The Shuffle was slower than it should've been. I have USB2 flash drives that I am almost positive transfer data faster than the Shuffle. Also, I get faster transfer from the CompactFlash card from my digicam hooked up to a USB 2 card reader.

So I'm optimistically predicting the nano will be faster than the Shuffle at transfers...
 
Top