Napster. At least, not when I was a member two years ago.Code Monkey said:Name *one* subscription only service out there that doesn't also have the option of "ownership".
I was a member two years ago, too, and you certainly could buy.RatherPlayHalo said:Napster. At least, not when I was a member two years ago.
Because emusic is currently the gem amongts "subscription" services. Emusic is a rarity, not an example, of most subscription services. The chances of iTunes taking on a similar model is slim to known.porieux said:Why do people assume subscription means renting? Ever heard of eMusic?
I agree with you wholey on this. It would be great if Apple went this route but to be honest I don't ever see them even doing a subscription type of service. It's a nice idea and I would really enjoy it (and alot of others too I think), but I think Apple looks at what can happen if people put their minds to it and that a subscription service isn't really a great thing for their bottom line. Guess we will have to just wait and see what they decide though.studogvetmed said:Because emusic is currently the gem amongts "subscription" services. Emusic is a rarity, not an example, of most subscription services. The chances of iTunes taking on a similar model is slim to known.