Ummmmm...OK. It's a media player...calm down.Dogenzaka said:That was 2001. It's a media player now. Get it right.
You keep insulting people that disagree with you. That's my point.Dogenzaka said:Your point?
I have seen many people myslf included give you guesses at this but the bottom line is no one here works at Apple. If you ar enot getting any answer you like than stop asking. And no shouting won't help.Dogenzaka said:It's simply that everyone I ask about why they put flash in there seem to answer me with "IT'S THE FUTURE. DENY THIS AND YOU SUCK."
I can tell you that you have 27 posts here and most are complaining about the touch.Dogenzaka said:Unless you're a mindreader, you have no basis to your judgment of my motives.
I believe that Archos company has one but Google might help you quite a bit.Dogenzaka said:Name another touchscreen widescreen media player and I'd be glad to.
I am not ranting about anything I am just sick of you flipping out about this topic.Dogenzaka said:Just like you are? I have the right to express my opinion on the new iPod, just like the other "ranters". YOU get over it.
Like I said I can read your posts. It doesn't take a mindreader to know you are trying to insult those that disagree with you or say what you want to hear. And bypassing means getting past them. Since I have alot of #### then I guess I'm not bypassing.Dogenzaka said:Once again, logically, you're not a mindreader, therefore cannot prove what I'm "thinking/implying/motives" are. I'm not insulting. You're the one bypassing the word filter. It seems to me you're the one in trouble.
Then discuss them but the point is you don't like the flash drive and Apple released it. Eventually you will realize that no matter how much you yell it won't change a thing and no one but the design crew has the reason. If you ask me it has to do with the mobile OS X being designed for flash drive and instead of re-doing it to use HDD for the iPod they just used the same code. I also think that design was a factor was well as the reliability and yes even battery life. And before I have to hear about the classic getting 40 hours again, think about this. The 80 gig classic uses the exact same battery as the 5.5 G 30 gig iPod that got 14 hours battery life. I wonder why? Could it be...different hardware and tweaked software?Dogenzaka said:The difference between a $300 iPod touch with 8GB and a $250 iPod classic with 80GB is highly worth discussing.