PDA

View Full Version : Thoughts and Comparison on Ultimate Ears SuperFi.5 Pro/ Shure E4C/Sony EX-71


code777
08-25-2005, 09:52 AM
Please choose the appropriate forum for this topic. Thank you. This comparison may be a bit premature but oh well...

Just bought a pair of UE SuperFi.5 Pro for my 4G40GB iPod. My friend bought a pair of Shure E4c's for his 60GB iPod Photo (he bought them only to try them out and will return them shortly).

My musical taste is basically heavy metal (i.e. - Atreyu, Dillinger Escape Plan, Exodus, Trivium, Arch Enemy, Etc... you get the pic) as well as jazz and various pop rock.

I have been using the Sony EX-71's for the past year or so. I was use to the boomy bass that the Sony's produced and the sometimes shrieking highs.

After some real hard work with opening the UE box (cuts all over my hands!) I finally got them out and checked out everything that it came with. I’m impressed with all the accessories it comes with. I checked out all the different ear tips first. I followed the instructions on how to get a good seal (rock n roll technique) and adjusted the ear loops to fit. Then I took them out (by the rock n roll technique) and took off the tips and tried the foam ones. Didn’t work for me. The fit was off. Not a fan of double flange tips didn’t feel right. So I stuck with the ones that they came with. Medium sized single flange tips which was the best fit for my ear.

The thing about these UE is they fit way deeper in the ear canal than the Sony’s. I was not use to this at all. Felt uncomfortable at first but as time went on I got use to it. When in my ears the seal is real tight. I mean ear plugs tight. I was kinda shocked being so use to the Sony’s. Next I plugged them into my iPod and I made the ill fated mistake of not turning the volume down. Pressed play BAM!! OUCH. Ok, the normal volume I listen to with my Sony’s is pretty loud. Little did I know the UE’s don’t need to be cranked!! Turned the level down to a comfortable level and sat back and listened.

My initial thoughts of the UE is MIDS MIDS MIDS! Wow, really not use to this. The Sony’s cut out all mids to achieve that boomy heavy bass. At first I really was not use to it. But as time went on I started to hear a ton of things I NEVER heard before with the Sony’s. Bass response is not boomy. I would describe the bass punchy, tight, and precise. I felt the bass response to be really good. I wasn’t use to punchy tight but love it because it just was more “accurate” sounding in your face rather than boomy and muddy (which is what I became accustomed to). The one thing that kinda lacks is the highs. I tried changing the poor iPod EQ to bring out those highs but I couldn’t find that setting. Either the EQ would bring out the highs and lower the bass or bring out even more bass and cut out all the highs. The happy medium I found was either the “Hip Hop”, “Electronic” or good ol “Rock” setting . I am pretty impressed with these things mainly because it really brought new life to the songs I was use to hearing using the Sony’s.

Are they worth it? Yes but I honestly do not think they are worth $250. Maybe $180 tops but hey what ya gonna do? The other thing that is not a big deal is the way they look. You really do look like Frankenstein wearing these things. But hey, it’s the sound that counts right!? Just a side note, I plugged the UEs into my home system and boy I tell ya, HUGE DIFFERENCE, incredible sound. The iPod’s amp is really poor. But you gotta make due with what you have (no way am I gonna lug around a portable amp for the iPod).

Quickly: I was able to try out the Shure E4c’s and I do love the design a lot better than the UEs but the tone is lacking big time (to my ears). It’s the bass. Its not enough even with a tight seal. Again this is all relative but for me I found the bass response to be poor for a $300 pair of canalphones. Maybe that’s why they are so discounted today. The Shures were more comfortable and the design is a bit better (wire stronger feeling, like how the cable runs behind your head, etc…) But it all comes down to tone. It had good mids and highs (better than the UEs) but I honestly feel it lacks in the bass dept. My friend agreed with me as well and will keep testing them for another few days.

I’ll keep on testing these UEs and come back in a few days with more comments. As of now they are a great improvement from the Sony’s. I like how you don’t have to crank the volume with the UE’s, the MIDs really shine and bring out things in songs you’d never hear, and the bass response is tight and punchy which is a nice change from the boomy muddy tone. I shall return!

egokun
08-26-2005, 06:16 PM
I'd like very much to try the Superfis, but living in Italy means I'll never have that chance unless I fork out the big money for a new pair. Given the price, trying before buying would be excellent.

I own a pair of Shure E4c and I'm very, very happy with them. There's only one problem with the E4c, and that's the iPod :( I hate to say this, but the E4c sound fantastic with pretty much everything but the iPod. Even with my old Sony portable CD player they bring out significant bass, and when plugged to a home hi-fi system, they truly give their best. Bass is there, definitely, but the iPod won't let it slip out. Believe me when I say that with the right equipment, the E4c have solid, thumping, very satisfying bass. Actually, a lot of people who tried both say that while the Superfis make an excellent pair with the iPod, the E4cs are the way to go if you're going to use them for more than just the iPod. I agree with them - with my home stereo system, the E4c are much less bright than with the iPod, and much warmer and more enjoyable.

Still, I wish I could give the Superfis a try, as they say they're very very musical, even with their recessed highs (BTW, there is no universal dual-driver canalphone with non-recessed highs on the market at the moment).

rx7_fan
08-26-2005, 06:43 PM
egokun, I agree with you that the bass on the E4 is very sufficient. However, code777 tired the E4 on his iPod as a source, so it lacked bass. The iPod is known to have bass rolled off. Personally, I feel that the E4 is superior to the super.fi 5 pro on a good source.

egokun
08-27-2005, 05:53 AM
Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying. They say that the sound from the iPod line-out is significantly better, but it requires a portable amp and that would kill portability. I don't understand why so many people want so many superfluous new features in the 5th-gen iPod, while what the iPod really needs is a strong, competitive internal amp to deliver good sound even out of the headphone jack.

Bottom line: it is good to judge how different phones sound out of the iPod, but it's not fair to judge a phone by how it sounds out of the iPod.

code777
08-28-2005, 12:33 AM
well have been using the UE's for the past few days and I really do love them. I'm use to the way they sound and won't go back to the EX-71's. When I did plug in my old EX-71s I was like where did all the tone go? I've got a good handle on how to put them in my ears to get a good seal. They are still sometimes a bit uncomfortable but within time i'll get use to them.

Tonight I am borrowing my friends E4c and as much as I like them for design and fit the tone is not as good IMHO with the iPod. Its that bass. Its not as punchy and tight as the SuperFi.5 Pro.

I just plugged in the E4c into my home system and DAMN they shine real good. Plenty of bass!! But again, my home system has a EQ unlike the iPod.

But if you need these for your iPod I think the SuperFi.5 Pros are the way to go.

rx7_fan
08-28-2005, 01:45 AM
I think UE does a good job tailoring to the iPod market with their super.fi products. Mainly because of their bass boost, they are preceived to be better than Shure products. However, when plugging both phones (SP5Pro, and E4) to a good source, I believe that the E4 will come out on top. Nonetheless, code777 does have a point by saying that if iPod is your main source, the SP5-Pro is the way to go. I think this is a very valid statement, and I agree =D

solvexyz
08-29-2005, 05:30 PM
I find Shure e4c is listenable with iPod if tri-flange is used. The bass is tight and punchy. Actually, I only use Westone UM2 if I am listening to all dance/rock music . Everything else is shure e4c for me.

code777
08-30-2005, 01:42 PM
well i have been using my friend's Shure E4Cs for the past few days and well, i find them more "fashionable" as they don't stick out like the UEs. He has been using my UEs for the past few days.

All I can say is this. The E4c's definitly have good overall tone. But I like bass. And when used with an iPod it lacks that quality big time to my ears. Its kinda just there with no power behind it. The mids/highs are very good. Highs are better than the UE. If the E4c had punchy powerful clean bass these would be the phones to have. The fit is better and I like how they look on you.

My friend explained he thought the UE's fit funny for him. He said he does not really like the "frankinstein" look. But he did say he likes the tone of them better than the E4c. He also likes a punchy bass.

So basically when using an iPod the E4c lacks bass but shines on highs and clarity. The UE have punchy strong clear bass but lacks in the highs. Both have good mids and clarity. E4cs seem to fit better in the ear and look better. UEs have the "frankinstein" look but they also fit well once you get the hang of them.

I'm keepin the UE's because of the bass factor. Now if Shure puts out something that has everything (maybe the E5c is the ticket but its too expensive) I'm all over it. But for now the UE's are the ones for me.