top earphones in the $20-$50 dollar price tag?

GO TO ADMIN PANEL > ADD-ONS AND INSTALL VERTIFORO SIDEBAR TO SEE FORUMS AND SIDEBAR

LPsoldier76

New member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
140
Points
0
hey.
im looking for new earphones for my iPod, and dont know which ones to get.
i like the Griffin TuneBuds cuz they look like they fit my needs, but i dont know how great they are compared to some other buds in the same category.
im looking for earphones, preferrably white or black, with nice bass.
noise isolation is optional.
can anyone recommend me some earphones?
thanks.
 

No One

New member
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
45
Points
0
Go with the koss ksc75. Everyone on head-fi recommends them. I like them too. They sound fantastic for the price.
 

paranoidxe

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2006
Messages
3,315
Points
0
I also recommend the KSC-75, if you want some sound isolation I'd recommend the $50 Sennheiser MX-75s they fit excellent. Problem with the KSC-75s is they tend to leak, you'll find yourself with the volume higher than normal levels to hear.
 

LPsoldier76

New member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
140
Points
0
No One said:
Go with the koss ksc75. Everyone on head-fi recommends them. I like them too. They sound fantastic for the price.
I'd prefer something that goes inside my ear though, thanks anyway.
 

ThisisCraigP

down for whatever
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
530
Points
0
Age
54
If you wanted some senns i would go with sennheiser mx 75 sport earphones. They have good sound quality theyll stay in your ear and you also have earbud sizes options. The cords neon green but for me its not a factor of bying a product. When i got mine they were 50 bucks wich is a good deal if you asked me.
 

paranoidxe

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2006
Messages
3,315
Points
0
Problem with MX-75s are the sound quality is VERY dependant on the angle you put the headphones in, you turn them one way you'll be flooded with bass, turn them another and it won't have any bass and will sound funny.
 

Jackonicko

Retired
Joined
May 14, 2002
Messages
6,552
Points
0
Location
Self imposed exile
Earthumps and tunebuds are truly dreadful!



See:

http://forums.ilounge.com/showthread.php?t=181101

Affordable In Ears an Overview

"Affordable in ears, an overview

It depends what you’re looking for, it depends how fussy you are about quality, and it depends what you are willing to spend.

You can buy in-ears for less than $10, and you can spend more than $900...... But price is not a reliable indicator of quality or performance.

Things have been changing a great deal in this area, recently, and many ‘old favourites’ (phones that I'd have recommended a year or eighteen months ago, have been utterly outclassed by relatively new entrants.

I have always taken a great interest in affordable in-ear headphones, and have amassed a huge collection – many of them given to me for review.

I will not comment on phones that I have not owned, or evaluated for an extended period, and I won’t recommend anything that I don’t own.

I would stress that I own, or have owned, every headphone mentioned in this post (bar the E500 and the Triple Fi 10) and have listened to them, extensively, back to back against each other. I'm not basing my impressions on five minutes (or less) listening to a friend's phones, or in a store. And if I were to say that something was: " infintely better than any of the Sony IEMs" it would at least be on the basis of having listened to and properly evaluated all of them. You can only properly compare phones that you know, and that you know pretty intimately, and recommending a phone if you've only heard it and the stock buds is understandable, but really pretty pointless.

Nor do I rely on my own impressions alone - if I had a particularly strong reaction to a phone, I'd wonder whether mine were representative, and I'd hesitate from stressing the point (the tiring coldness of the ER6i, for example) before I'd discussed it with other people whose opinions I valued, and preferably not before I had listened to an alternative pair of the same phones, and I'd be happiest if the point I was making was endorsed or echoed by the more grounded and sensible among on line communities.

You can buy some very cheap in-ears, but they are, in my view, dreadful, and not worth the money. All in-ear phones have more isolation than earbuds that don’t go into the ear canal, and give an immediacy that is refreshing. They are also very comfortable. But the feeling soon wears out if you compare the cheaper in ears with better gear, when their shortcomings become immediately apparent. I would single out the Koss ‘The Plug’, Skull Candys, Earthumps and Earjams as being a particularly pernicious and cynical way of parting naïve youngsters from their cash.

I think that you really need to be spending at least $50.

However, if pressed, I would say that at the sub $30 level, for an IEM, and not a bud, I don't think you can do better than the JVC HA FX55, though at this bargain basement price point I think that you’re better off with conventional buds like the Sennheiser MX400, and the Sony ED21LP. It's not like at higher price points, where there is more GOOD competition, and where there is a wider range of choices to suit different musical tastes.

Some may recommend the cheaper models in the Sony EX51/70/71/81 family of earphones at this price point. They have strong bass, but it's muddy, toneless and very crude, and you can get bass that's better defined and just as powerful. The Sonys also suffer from a harshness and a ‘hissy’ sibilance in the higher ranges. recent models have also suffered quality problems with the cords, which tend to disintegrate with age/sweat/heat/use.

The JVC HA FX55 is at least a huge improvement over these dreadful phones.

At the $50 price point, my recommendations would include the Sennheiser CX300, which offers great value for money. It uses the same housing as the Creative EP630 and the four-pole Sharp MD33, and, I think, as the AKG K324.

They seem to use different, or differently tuned drivers, and I prefer the CX300 to the 630.

There needs to be a health warning here, as the CX300 is being widely copied in China, and the fakes/counterfeits are often sold cheaply on eBay. If you want CX300s buy these from somewhere reputable, and if the price seems to good to be true, it probably is.

If you want more prominent bass and lighter weight than the CX300, one good alternative at this price point is the
manufacturer censored/model name censored. It's bassier than the CX300, and lighter, so it stays in the ear better, I personally prefer the sound of the CX300, though some would say that the manufacturer censored has marginally better sound.

Apple’s own In Ears are not bad, if you’re among the minority who can use them. Most find that they don't fit, and that they therefore don’t stay in the ear well.

At $90-$100 choices start to really open out, though my recommendations would be for three newcomers - the Panasonic HJE70, the Sony EX90, and the
manufacturer censored/newer model name censored, all of which represent excellent value for money performance, and which effortlessly outperform better known more strongly hyped branded competitors.

The Panasonic HJE70 ($88) gives a lovely warm sound, with super-cool design, and comes with a superb titanium case included. The HJE70 is very comfortable, and my only reservation is that there seems to be some patchy quality control – you can find really poor sounding HJE70s, though mine are simply superb.

I’m a big fan of the Sony EX90 ($90) which has good, solid sound, but whose real unique selling point is an unusual combination of excellent comfort and brilliant fit. The EX90 stays in the ear extremely well. It doesn’t isolate as completely as some IEMs, which further enhances its suitability for running. It even comes with a great leather box. The only real problem is that the cords are slightly fragile.

The new
manufacturer censored/newer model name censored sells for $*** exact price would identify phone and is a brand new, compact, ultra-light, metal bodied IEM. Positive, subjective comment removed lest it be interpreted as 'promotion'.

Other alternatives include the $120 Audio Technica ATH CK7, another metal-bodied IEM, whose only real difference is a cleaner, less bassy sound. This is a nice headphone, and represents a great alternative to the ER6i.

Some like the Westone phones, but I’m unimpressed, personally.

I’d reject the $109 Shure E2C because it’s exceptionally uncomfortable, and because the sound is mediocre for the price, while many users report cord problems.

I’d reject the $139 Etymotic ER6i for being too cold and clinical, for being over-isolating, and for having an uninvolving sound. The ER6is would be dangerous for running - they block out too much of the outside world and you'll never hear the truck that kills you!

The Altec Lansing iM616 ($150) uses the same technology and is no better.

Though Ultimate Ears make some great phones, I think that their low end offering, the $100 SuperFi 3, is poor, and could not recommend it.

I’m horrified at the price of some of the high end ear-gear I’ve been given, most of which is superb, but most of which is not so good that I’d spend my own money on it.

Of course anything about sound preferences will be subjective, and anything that criticises higher end gear will be controversial. If you've spent $299 on ER4s, it's human nature to be unhappy (even angry) if someone tells the world that they could do better for $100, and that you've been buying 'snake oil'.

An exception would be the $200 SuperFi 5EB, which does at least offer a unique sound stage.

For the sake of completeness, other choices for the ‘more money than sense brigade’ include the:

SuperFi 5 Pro $250
Etymotic ER4 $299
Shure E4 $319
Ultimate Ears Triple Fi 10 $400 (I don’t own these)
Shure E500 $500 (I don’t own these)
E5C $550

None of them are even twice as good as the best $100 phones, so you are paying hundreds of dollars for relatively small steps in quality.



IEM features and variables:

Driver size
I used to think that there was a direct relationship between sound quality and driver size - and this would be born out by listening to the EX51/70/71 (with a tiny 9 mm driver) and (say) the E888 with a much bigger driver. But there are plenty of small driver phones that deliver superb sound, and I now realise that driver size is not critical.

Impedence
Impedence will affect primarily how loud the phones sound. Most go loud enough to damage your hearing, so I'd question the relevance.....

Frequency response
Frequency response, too, is of questionable import, since there are $300 and $400 IEMs with narrower frequency response than some $25 phones. Guess which sound better?

Other factors
Cord length, plug style (straight or L) and configuration (even or asymmetric) are real differences, to be sure, and do make a difference, but there is no 'better' or 'worse' since it's a matter of preference.

I personally prefer an L-shaped plug, a longer cord, and an asymmetric arrangement. But none of those are deal-breakers for me - what I really want is phones that make my music sound as good as it can for the price, and that's the basis of my recommendations above."



Since the original thread was written, I've been told not to mention a particular headphone manufacturer. The company exists, and lest anyone think I'm unaware of its two IEMs, I've left references to them in, for the sake of completeness, but have removed the names, and have removed or blurred any subjective opinion or recommendation.
 

KinesongPayaso

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
18
Points
0
koss KSC 75

just look up the reviews, before dissing it. even if you want in ear solutions
 

mjmoonwalker

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
3,403
Points
0
Location
Shangri-La
Website
eminemjamesuk.com
LPsoldier76 said:
do you know how these compare to the Griffin Earthumps/TuneBuds?
I've tried the EarThumps and they're by far the worst built earbuds I have ever used. They're even worse than Apple's own pack-ins (or at least the old ones). The wires keep breaking, rubber tips don't fit, too much bass, etc. Blah!
 

TheBigNewt

New member
Joined
Feb 26, 2006
Messages
391
Points
0
Location
Prescott, Arizona
For $25 you can't beat Sony Funtopia 51's. And they pack really small if you like to keep them in your pocket. The con is the wires are pretty thin, so be careful not to yank on them. Good bass.
 

blznmijit

New member
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
11
Points
0
for me i think the best for the very low end are the 25 dollar skull candies that i use and my brother uses jvc marshmallowes. The best part is that they can both be bought at local places like best buy for the marshmallows and fye for the skull candies so you dont have ot order off line
 

Jackonicko

Retired
Joined
May 14, 2002
Messages
6,552
Points
0
Location
Self imposed exile
"For $25 you can't beat Sony Fontopia 51's"

only if you're looking at a list of the world's most overrated and disappointingly poor-sounding headphones - Fontopia's (EX51s and 71s) are comfortable, but poorly made (the cords disintegrate) and sound muddy and hissy.

"the best for the very low end are the 25 dollar skull candies..."

again, you have a recommendation for one of the worst headphones you can buy.

The JVC HA-FX-55 is OK among the cheapies, but you really need to spend more - the CX300s are really quite good.
 
Last edited:

LPsoldier76

New member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
140
Points
0
can the CX300s be bought at any stores?
also, are the apple inear phones better than the regular ones?
 
Top